Why To Vote For Nader |
||
CommentsCreate Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:26 am MST by Lakers Tickets
Other interesting scenarios: Kerry wins because few vote for Nader. Iraq gets worse. Kerry keeps sending in more troops. Many Democrats look for someone else and split the party in 2008. A hardline Repub (even more conservative than Bush) gets elected in 2008. Bush wins because of Nader's strong turnout. Iraq gets worse. Bush keeps sending in more troops. Democrats reform and pick up many of Nader's positions (including the one on Iraq). A new and improved Democrat candidate wins in 2008. Wed Oct 27, 2004 5:28 pm MST by Anonymous
Your arguments would be legitimate if Nader had any chance to win and if the only thing issue involved in this election is how the various candidates would act to get us out of Iraq. Even there, however, it ignores Bush's propensity to screw everything up. And that's the basic problem with Bush. Even if Bush and Kerry had virtually indistinguishable positions on all issues (which they decidedly do not), you stil have to take into account that Bush and his administration have made an art form for hoping for the best and planning as if no other outcome were possible, leaving them grossly unprepared for any other result. I won't go so far as to say that a vote for Nader in this election is a vote for Bush, but as Nader has absolutely no earthly possibility of winning, a vote for Nader instead of for Kerry does increase the likelihood that Bush will be elected. I'm not sure that with that outcome we can count on having a chance to ever cast a meaningful vote again. Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:45 pm MST by mrgumby2u
Add Comment |
Search This SiteSyndicate this blog site Powered by BlogEasy Free Blog Hosting | |
|